May 28, 2008

May 20, 2008

Eating junk

NY Times just published an article on why monkeys and humans eat junk food.
“These results may not surprise any stressed-out wage slave
who has polished off a quart of Häagen-Dazs at midnight while contemplating the
day’s humiliations. But the experiment intrigues scientists studying human
junk-food binges, which are hard to understand because there are so many
confounding factors.”

“The stress seemed to affect snacking in different ways for
each sex. The women given solvable puzzles ate more grapes than M&Ms, while
the women under stress preferred M&Ms. The men ate more of the high-fat
snacks when they were not under stress, apparently because the ones who
got the easy anagrams had more time to relax and have a treat.”

May 9, 2008

We will not request the cars we need

In a brilliant move, the Bangalore powers that be have decided to engage in “commandeer vehicles in the national interest".  Read on.
 
I love the language and sentiments expressed in the quotes.  They’re sufficiently archaic to be funny - as long as it’s not your car getting “commandeered”.
 

Ready to Rot

Tired of your furniture? Have you tried composting it?
 
 

May 5, 2008

Microsoft's Woes

The problem with Microsoft is that it has a single strategy – ride on the back of Windows OS.  Ever since Bill Gates’ DOS ended up in the right place at the right time and got adopted by IBM for its PCs, the company has struggled to find its footing outside of operating systems and “hygiene” software.  Its Office Professional application suite took off only after it offered deep discounts to computer manufacturers (OEMs) and, in those days, assembler/resellers (VARs) for pre-installing the software on all systems sold. 
 
If you leave out forays into hardware (mouse, X-box), all other Microsoft software is sold on the basis of its linkage to Windows OS.  And, if anti-trust regulation limits the company’s ability to bundle in more software at deep discounts to its retail price, Microsoft is obviously left in a bind.
 
It hasn’t really figured out how to make a dent in other spaces.  The software remains woefully archaic, and the attempts to update it every 3 years only end up frustrating users who have finally managed to figure out how to get the software to do what they want it to do.  By the time your efficiency reaches an acceptable level, your IT department has been cajoled by deep discounts for early-adopters and mirages of future super-efficiency, to upgrade all users to Windows 2020.
 
In Excel, if you have to convert a number that has been designated as text (for what-ever reason) back into a number, you have to first type 1 in a new cell, then multiply the cell in question by this ‘1’.  If you are lucky the original cell will now recognize that its content is a number not text.  If you are unlucky, status quo will remain and you in frustration will re-type the content as a number. So, after 20 odd years of development investment into Excel, this is the best the thousands of researchers and programmers at Microsoft have come up with.
 
In today’s “collaborative” world, it is surprising that Microsoft hasn’t provided simple features to make people’s life easier.  Such as turning an email into a item on the calendar – in ONE step.  Or, easy-to-use annotation abilities in Excel (not cell by cell comments) for easy sharing of ideas among teams spread across continents.  The majority of corporate communicate today happens in PPT slides, but the annotation capabilities are pathetic.  The microscopic yellow tab can’t be seen without a strong lens… and you can’t circle something and put a comment around it.  Buying add-ons are not the answer since most corporate IS teams are on a crusade to surreptitiously remove all unauthorized software from corporate hard-drives.
 
And as for entering the Web 2.0 age, buying Yahoo is not the answer. Providing a Facebook-Youtube-whatever, suite of applications that corporate IS departments are not petrified of, is.